Obama & Bush – Arrogance vs. Humility

Notice the difference in tone between our last two presidents. The use of “I” hits you like a cheese grater on the cheek if you’re a student of writing and speeches, yet we ate it up as a country. Now that the polls have dropped again, we can look at this as a possible reason why.

George W. Bush’s speech after the capture of Saddam:

The success of yesterday’s mission is a tribute to our men and women now serving in Iraq. The operation was based on the superb work of intelligence analysts who found the dictator’s footprints in a vast country. The operation was carried out with skill and precision by a brave fighting force. Our servicemen and women and our coalition allies have faced many dangers in the hunt for members of the fallen regime, and in their effort to bring hope and freedom to the Iraqi people. Their work continues, and so do the risks. Today, on behalf of the nation, I thank the members of our Armed Forces and I congratulate ‘em.

Barack Obama’s speech after the killing of bin Laden:

And so shortly after taking office, I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority of our war against al Qaeda, even as we continued our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat his network. Then, last August, after years of painstaking work by our intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain, and it took many months to run this thread to ground. I met repeatedly with my national security team as we developed more information about the possibility that we had located bin Laden hiding within a compound deep inside of Pakistan. And finally, last week, I determined that we had enough intelligence to take action, and [I ] authorized an operation to get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice. Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad , Pakistan.

  • RLAndrews57

     Excellent contrast. “There is no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn’t matter who gets the credit.”
    Ralph Waldo Emerson

  • Chilcutt

    Just taking parts of speeches to make your point is very misleading. Not to mention the mission accomplished banner he flew behind the aircraft shortly after the capture of Saddam Hussein (which had nothing to do with attacks on America.) now that’s arrogance at its finest.

    • Anonymous

       I don’t think highlighting parts of speeches given by each president are
      misleading.  Neither president wrote those themselves.  They may of had
      some direction as to what they wanted it to say, but to make it sound as though they did, it had to carry their tone.  Wasn’t the mission to bring down Saddam?  So how is a banner declaring “Mission Accomplished” arrogant?  I do have strong opinions surrounding 9/11.  I don’t believe it was a surprise attack at all and I don’t believe a plane hit the Pentagon.  I don’t follow politics at all just to be clear.

    • Andrews-dad

      The mission accomplished banner was put there by the ship President Bush was on, not by the President or any of his staff.  The ships mission was over, the ship accomplished its mission.  This has been known since it has happend and for the public not to realize the truth is a sad statement about the media.

  • Cmyk

    The US supported Saddam throughout the 1980s and through his worst crimes. You can even watch Donald Rumsfeld meeting him in December 1983 on YouTube which preceded Iraq acquiring “most favoured nation status”.