
Chug! Chug! Chug!
How much do you have to drink in order for your annual physical to declare a physician recommended “moderation of alcohol intake?” I’m guessing it’s significant unless he’s got some sort of genetic kidney or liver issue that pre-disposes him to issues with small amounts of alcohol that would be generally consistent with “social drinking.” Short of being an alcoholic or a medical freak, I can’t imagine why the doctors suggested putting down that drink. Source: The Guardian
On to the bigger issue
Do we want a president who is even moderately intoxicated? Personally, I think that would explain a lot about his decisions and spending sprees of the last year, but that’s not even where I’m going here. So, the next 9/11 hits us because he’s asleep at the wheel of national security and dismantling the fabric of our being bit by bit. Do we want a “leader” who has just pounded back 14 beers or 3 screwdrivers?
I think not.

Nicolae Carpathia emerging?
If this doesn’t scare you, nothing will… an excerpt from Cal Thomas’ column brings some pretty good points.
Cal Thomas: Who is Rashad Hussain?
By:Cal Thomas
Examiner Columnist
February 18, 2010
President Obama’s appointment of Rashad Hussain, his deputy associate counsel, as special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference — the second largest intergovernmental organization after the United Nations, charged with safeguarding and protecting “the interests of the Muslim world” — should be of serious concern to Congress and the American public.
Especially because Hussain, a devout Muslim, has a history of participating in events connected with the Muslim Brotherhood, according to the Chicago Tribune, “the world’s most influential Islamic fundamentalist group” whose goal is to create Muslim states throughout the world.
In 1991, a memo written by Mohamed Akram for the Shura Council of the Muslim Brotherhood spelled out the objective of the organization. Akram said the Muslim Brotherhood “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ’sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
I am unable to find any “revelation” that has repealed that objective. Quite the contrary. Terrorists seem on track for implementing it.
The president proudly announced that Hussain is a Hafiz, someone who has completely memorized the Quran, but he did not spell out what qualifies Hussain to meet with foreign leaders at a diplomatic level in a role that approximates that of an ambassador. According to Jihad Watch, a blog directed by American author Robert Spencer that “aims to bring to public attention the role of jihad theology and ideology in the modern world,” Hussain’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood date back to his days at Yale Law School.
Read more at the Washington Examiner:http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Who-is-Rashad-Hussain_-84604307.html#ixzz0gITmy5yz
I’ll admit it: I almost completely broke down watching McCain’s concession speech. I nearly lost it when he said he was going to support Obama and Biden and the crowd started to boo, and he calmly said, “Please. Please.” I’m tearing up remembering that. It will be burned in my mind forever.
I woke up in a dismal mood this morning, with Beautiful not realizing that this result was going to have such a profound impact on me. It’s not about the man, the race, the war, the inexperience, the shady connections. It’s more than that.
I’m deeply saddened by 40% of our country knowingly electing a fully socialst, Marxist government whether they understand the meaning of those terms or not. They understood the claims and the promises and wanted it – badly.
Here are the facts: (more…)
In an interview in 2001, Barack (Barry) Obama said the following about the civil right’s movement:
“If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples so that I would now have the right to vote I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it, I’d be okay, but the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in the society, and to that extent as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical… it didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the constitution at least as it’s been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that generally the constitution is a charter of negative liberties… says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf… and that hasn’t shifted and one of, I think, the tragedies of the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that.
Are you serious!? This man will not be able to honestly be able to take the oath of office if he should so tragically win the election:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. – Wikipedia
Recent Feedback